Explosive conditions in Jerusalem
Type Here to Get Search Results !

Explosive conditions in Jerusalem

Explosive conditions in Jerusalem

It is possible that it will be the month of Ramadan and there will be no reports of violence from Jerusalem. Once again, Laylat al-Qadr was the scene of clashes between Israeli police and thousands of Palestinians seeking worship at the Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem.

More than 500 Palestinians have been injured in the unrest over the past 10 days. Most are teenagers, but they include 29 children under the age of 15. Among the hundreds of Palestinians arrested are at least ten children. Ambulances carrying the wounded were repeatedly stopped by Israeli police and a temporary medical aid clinic was damaged.

The uproar is so intense that even the Biden administration has had to take serious note. A White House statement called on Israeli officials to "treat the inhabitants of East Jerusalem with kindness and respect."

The latest feud erupted when a Jerusalem district court last month ordered six Palestinian refugee families, who have lived in the ancient East Jerusalem neighborhood of Sheikh Jarrah for nearly 70 years, to vacate their homes by May 1 to accommodate Jewish settlers. Seven other families have been given until August 1 to vacate their homes. As a result of the implementation of this order, 58 Palestinians, including 17 children, will lose their roofs.

This did not happen all of a sudden. In 1937, Prime Minister Golda Meir's cabinet decided to phase out 90 percent of the Arab population in occupied Jerusalem and increase the city's population to 70-30. That is 70% Jews and 30% Palestinian Arabs.

Explosive conditions in Jerusalem


East Jerusalem as Capital of Israel

The Palestinians consider East Jerusalem to be the capital of the future state, while Israel claims the whole of Jerusalem. Since the military occupation in 1967, 200,000 Jews have been settled to change the proportion of Jerusalem's population. Forty thousand Palestinians have been pushed out through various legal means and their resettlement in the city is legally prohibited.

Last year, another 4,500 new homes were built for Jews in East Jerusalem. One hundred and seventy Palestinian properties, including one hundred and five houses, were demolished in the old city during the same period, leaving another three hundred and eighty-five Palestinians homeless.

In mid-April, hardline nationalist Jewish groups began patrolling the old Jerusalem city and tortured Palestinians in the presence of police to create a new eviction atmosphere, paving the way for the next step in a climate of panic.

On May 1, Israeli police escorted Palestinian families out of six houses in the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood and dumped their belongings, handing them over to Jews who had fled the United States last year with the intention of settling here permanently. When a Palestinian girl shouted at a Jewish settler who had entered her own house, "What right do you have to evict us?" The settler replied, "If I had not occupied, someone else would have done it." '

Although under international law, the occupying power cannot be enforced in the military-occupied territories, seven bloods are forgiven on Israel. Even the Supreme Court has recognized the principle that Jerusalem is not occupied territory but a legal part of Israel, so state laws will apply here as well.

On the 27th of last month, the leading human rights organization Human Rights Watch released for the first time a 213-page detailed report on Israel's phased genocidal policies. The report concludes that in the last 73 years, Israel has No matter how many policies are implemented in the name of security, they have less to do with security and more than trying to besiege an entire nation by adopting racist practices. According to the report, this policy is based on four pillars. Characterization, political and social isolation, constant pressure, and eviction.

Multi-pronged policy against Jerusalem

For the success of this policy, multi-pronged measures are continuous regarding Jerusalem. In other words, the process of resettlement should be expedited to change the ground realities. The old population should be evicted from their homes under the guise of law. New construction permits should not be issued to Palestinian Arabs. Their employment should be fully controlled. They should be kept in a state of insecurity and uncertainty through humiliating treatment at check posts. When there is a backlash against these policies about Jerusalem, it should be suppressed through indiscriminate violence, arrests, torture and killings.

The report says that these policies are less than the legitimate requirements of Israel's geographical security and more than a formal violation of human rights. Fundamental rights cannot be violated under the guise of any security ideology. Apartheid almost meets the definition of a state.

Human rights reports about Jerusalem

As expected, the United States simply said in a statement to Human Rights Watch that "the parties must show restraint." But the report was so sensational that the BBC and the Guardian, as well as the American Channel C the NN, the New York Times and the Washington Post were also forced to mention it. However, the US media, especially Israel, has been cautious about broadcasting or publishing critical views.

Learn More:  History of the Founder of Jerusalem

But the biggest surprise is Canada's attitude. Canada's reputation is that it not only takes human rights issues traditionally seriously but also gives a formal opinion. Let it be the case of Xinjiang's Muslims in China, that in Syria. Human rights violations or the detention of human rights activists in Saudi Arabia or the military dictatorship in Burma Human rights violations in Syria or the detention of human rights activists in Saudi Arabia or the military dictatorship in Burma's violence against the people or the Indian peasant movement against the Modi government. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his Secretary of State Marc Garno never fail to speak their minds.

But the government has been silent since Human Rights Watch's explosives report on Israel was published. With the exception of The Canadian Press Wire and The Globe and Mail, the entire media has sniffed the snake.

Even the soft-spoken United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia have called for an immediate end to the eviction of Palestinians in Jerusalem. Imran Khan has also said that the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) should do something. However, the OIC is not even capable of changing its footprint. In this context, the attitude of Canada and the European Union is interesting and meaningful. The United States has rejected Human Rights Watch's analysis that Israel has come very close to the definition of a racist apartheid state. He has also taken more or less the same position on this report as the United States.

Tags

Post a Comment

0 Comments
* Please Don't Spam Here. All the Comments are Reviewed by Admin.